Chapter one
The Fundamental Order of the Universe
Section 1. The Manifestation of God’s Dual Characteristics
1.1. God is the Original Being having unified dual characteristics
1.1.1. God is the Original Being of unified love
If
we observe the universe, it shows us that everything exists through a reciprocal
relationship formed between the dual characteristics of positivity and negativity.
This principle applies in every case, beginning at the level of the minerals. A
molecule is formed through the fusion of positive and negative ions. In the
case of plants, subsistence and reproduction depend on the union of their male
and female counterparts, stamen and pistil. These dual characteristics are more
pronounced in the case of animals. All animals, including fish, birds and mammals
exist in male and female form. Finally, we human beings, God’s greatest
creation, are divided into men and women. The first man, Adam, and the first
woman, Eve, are the progenitors of the human race. What is the purpose of existence
of the dual characteristics of male and female? Why did God create in such a
manner? (201-204, 1990.4.9)
What
did God want to do by creating man and woman? He wanted to see them. Is God
feminine or masculine? He is both feminine and masculine. If God were only
masculine, He would only look at the woman, and Adam would have to live in the
shade. It follows that the two natures of both sexes coexist within Him, so
that He may find joy in looking at both woman and man. We thus conclude that
God is a being in the vertical position, within whom the harmonized dual
characteristics that make Him feel love towards both man and woman exist. Such
is God. He needs both man and woman, and wherever He goes He is always in the
position of the subject partner, that is, having subject-partner status. Thus,
God combines a central subject-like masculine character, and an objective
horizontal feminine character within Himself. (188-92, 1989.2.19)
Is
there one God or two? There is only one God. Since there is only one of Him, how
then could He enter two people at once? Would He go into each of them
alternately, into the man and then out and into the woman, and so on? Furthermore,
considering that there are so many people in the world, how would He enter and
exit all of them? This poses a problem. The Unification Church’s Divine
Principle teaches that God is a being having unified dual characteristics. This
is the principle. God is a being who is the harmonious union of dual characteristics.
This is a truly wonderful conclusion. (41-290, 1971.2.17)
God
is the Subject with dual characteristics who stands in the masculine position.
Then who is He like? He is like us, you and me. He is the same as we are.
Accordingly, the position of subject partner presupposes that of an object partner.
It contains such a meaning. It arose out of its need for that reciprocal partner.
(124-83, 1983.1.30)
In a
lecture on the Principle of Creation, it is simply stated, “God is the subject
who incorporates dual characteristics and a harmonious union of masculinity and
femininity.” When we say He is the harmonious subject, what does that mean?
What pleasure would He derive from having a harmonious union of masculinity and
femininity in the subject position? Centering on what, should God be
harmonious? God is a harmonious being centered on love. (193-153, 1989.10.3)
What
does God want? What did He want to do through the creation and perfection of
the ideal of creation? He wanted to fulfill love. What would God want for
Himself? In terms of the Principle, He is a being with harmonized dual
characteristics. He is a subject being. In summary, He is a masculine subject
being. (149-9, 1986.11.1)
What
is the source of unity? What would allow God, alone as He is, to stand in the
joyful position of unity? In terms of the Principle, God is the being with
harmonized dual characteristics in the masculine position. We need to discern
what this position signifies. The one who stands in the masculine position is
the subject partner and the plus, but the plus cannot be without a minus. Considering
this view, why would He be in the plus position? It would be because of love.
Even the Absolute God desires to obey true love absolutely. If love is not
based on the mind to submit and become one absolutely, there can be no unity,
harmony, or concord. Instead, all would disperse without such a source. (195-20,
1989.11.1)
Given
that human beings were created by God, what should they do? He created the
object partners of His love for the purpose of His joy. Through what would He
feel joy? It would be through love. Even God, the Absolute Being, requires
love. Isn’t that so? Existing as the Subject, yet even with His dual characteristics,
He inevitably needs an object partner of His love, which is why He created
everything in the universe. (223-300, 1991.11.17)
Man
and woman are not enough to fulfill love. They are just two beings. Just connecting
them is not enough to fulfill love. It is the love from the central position
that brings them together and moves them. Then, if we were to trace back this
coming together in love of man and woman to its beginning, we would clearly see
that it stems from God’s dual characteristics. The union of masculinity and
femininity that exists within God was developed and manifested in the
reciprocal relationships of creation. Thus, God desires that the object partner
of His love be better than Him. (210- 317, 1990.12.27)
Let
me draw the conclusion in precise terms: God is the Subject Being who possesses
harmonized dual characteristics. When viewed from the right side He can appear
as a man, and from the left side, a woman. Isn’t that what dual characteristics
signify? Since He is like that from the side, then from above He can appear as
a man and from below a woman. Only then will both woman and man be satisfied
and say, “Alright!” (139-56, 1986.1.26)
Unless
a religious person comes forward with a logic that offers a clear scientific
explanation of cause, process, and result, the religious world cannot be saved.
The Divine Principle of the Unification Church has such logic as described
above. The conclusion suggested by that fits everything: that God exists with
dual characteristics, that He is the Subject partner and the universe is His
object partner, and that therefore He is the Subject partner of love and humankind
was created as the object partner of His love. This fundamental relationship
continued through the power of love which bound it to the eternal world,
transcending history. This action of love continued through thousands of years,
and whereas other forms of power became weaker as time passed, this power of
love remained strong. (219- 178, 1991.8.29)
Even
God makes unity based on love. The Unification Church also has this concept,
and that is how it can unify the world. This, however, is not the case with
Christianity. Christianity teaches that God is an absolute and omnipotent God.
He can do anything. This is wrong. Although God can do anything, according to
the original principle, love is supposed to be fulfilled by two beings. Thus,
it is intended for dual characteristics to be united, and love is possible only
when that condition is fulfilled. (224-155, 1991.11.24)
As
God is a being with harmonized dual characteristics, what would be the center
of this harmonious being of duality? It would be love. Even God has based His
very existence on true love. (193-303, 1989.10.8)
What
is God like? As expounded in Divine Principle, He is the Subject being with dual
characteristics that are harmoniously unified. The essence of that Subject
being is love, an absolute love. (136-37, 1985.12.20)
How
does the Divine Principle depict God? He is the Subject with dual characteristics
in a union of harmony as well as the Subject of love. The word love must be
added to the description without fail. (223-160, 1991.11.10)
For
God to become the harmonized being whose dual characteristics are separately
represented in the form of Adam and Eve, as created by Him, around what should
the harmonized being be centered? This being should be centered on love, and in
the masculine position of the Subject in relation to all creation. (194-64,
1989.10.15)
Why
did God create human beings? We first need to answer the fundamental question:
“Why was I born?” God is the Subject of love. Doesn’t the Divine Principle
refer to Him as a being with a harmonious union of dual characteristics?
However, it has not been disclosed until now that He is also a unified being based
on love, maintaining a state of harmony. Therefore, it should be added to His
description that He is the being of unity based on love. (223-268, 1991.11.12)
Where
is the origin of human love and life? Doesn’t it lie within God? He is the
Subject Being with harmonized dual characteristics and at the same time is the
source of love. It should be added in the Divine Principle that God is the source
of true love. It should be clear that nobody but myself can amend the Divine
Principle. (224-228, 1991.11.24)
The
starting point is the question of whether God exists or not. If He does exist,
what relationship does He have with humankind? For Him to be able to relate
with human beings, He must be a personal god. We have fully awakened to that
fact. As a personal god, He must be like us. Just as human beings have an
internal nature and an external form as part of their characteristics, God, who
created them, must possess those same characteristics for the sake of their
common purpose. The concept of dual characteristics arises from this. (167-243,
1987.7.21)
If
God is a personal god, who would He be like? He is the combined form of Adam
and Eve. God is the Subject of dual characteristics. He is not a messy combination
of male and female. While being the combined form, He nevertheless occupies the
position of the subject partner. The coming together in union of man and woman
as object partners of their invisible subject partner God is the way for Adam
and Eve as human beings to perfect His ideal of creation. (166-208, 1987.6.7)
Oriental
philosophy does not have the concept of the personal God. It is ignorant of His
existence. They talk of yin and yang, but such vague terms cannot sufficiently
describe the personal Origin. Everything must be understood clearly from the
roots. It should be the root that illustrates the characteristics of both man
and woman which can explain how human beings turned out as they are today. From
this perspective, the logic of dual characteristics as taught in the
Unification Church is truly a great one. (145-196, 1986.5.4)
No comments:
Post a Comment